This weekend I spent a lazy Sunday morning in bed with a cup of coffee and Z, determined to finish the book. As I neared the final chapters I felt my brain twitching and a disturbing knee-jerk reaction to wholly and fully despise F. Scott Fitzgerald. What a monster! What a jerk! Selfish bastard! And, of course, Poor Zelda.
But that’s not really fair, right? It’s historical fiction, and in this book, it’s heavy emphasis on the fiction. Author Therese Fowler explains in her acknowledgments that Z is simply her rendition of what happened between two of literature’s most notorious characters; it’s her version of the Fitzgeralds, told after condensing countless letters, biographies, and interviews, and filling in the gaps left by those preserving documents. So, it’s not decent or fair or true to call Fitzgerald a monster based on Fowler’s at times poor characterization of him.
That’s the trouble with historical fiction, isn’t it? I don’t read the genre often, but every once in a while I’m completely blown away by the strength of the novel and its ability to immerse me in past’s grandeur. The Known World is one such novel. But often I run the trouble of mistaking fictionalized minutiae for hard facts and mounting evidence for one’s failings and I end up hating F. Scott Fitzgerald with all my might, just like I did with Hemingway in The Paris Wife. A good question here might be is it historical fiction in general that I get too involved in or just the Jazz Age folks?
I liked Z because it lent an interesting voice to a tragic woman, who, according to those letters and biographies Fowler utilized, lived a tumultuous life with little consistency or support. But, that voice often felt flat and I missed some of the conviction a woman as passionate as Zelda surely possessed. Her revelations on her flailing marriage lacked emotion and her ruminations on her own potential and inability to fully tap into and capitalize on it often left me confused and not fully convinced.
I was eager for this novel but my final impression is that Fowler was playing it safe and refusing to ruffle feathers for the right reasons. Instead, she got a lot of people talking about the inadequacy of the novel and its failure to personify such a significant and vibrant woman. Though, perhaps that was bound to happen given what a palatial legacy Zelda left behind.
It was a fun and easy read, something I would have been perfectly happy with on the beach, or as it were, inside on rainy days. I wouldn’t run after it, however. Although, I’m now jonesing for another viewing of Midnight in Paris.
What are your thoughts on historical fiction? Are there any time periods that you’re drawn to in particular? Have you read Z? What are your thoughts? Better yet, have you read anything by Zelda Fitzgerald? I haven’t, but now I fully intend to given that writing, along with dancing and painting, was a true passion of hers.











































